The unions hate
it. The owners are going to vote
against it. The New York Observer says that it’s sunk.
So is there any hope for Rupert Murdoch in his bid to buy Dow
Jones?
In a word, yes: and a lot of the reason is in the stock price. The Bancrofts
allowed Murdoch’s bid to get this far, rather than dismissing it out of hand,
as they’ve done with any number of bids in the past. Murdoch himself described
the bid as "friendly". So the Bancrofts look as though they’re holding
out for a higher sum, rather than simply refusing.
What’s more, the Bancrofts, as controlling shareholders, do actually have a
fiduciary duty to the non-controlling shareholders, as Gary Lutin
notes here.
If the company turns out not to be for sale and the share price collapses back
to where it was pre-bid, there’s going to be a lot of very unhappy shareholders
that the Bancrofts will have to answer to.
Finally, there’s almost certain to be a bidding war, now that Dow Jones is
in play. If anything, the problem is that there aren’t going to be enough investment
banks to advise all the possible suitors – which range from the Washington
Post and the New York Times through Pearson and Reuters to GE and even Yahoo.
Not to mention the occasional billionaire with a yen for a trophy publication
or any number of private-equity shops for whom $5 billion or $6 billion is the
kind of money you find down the back of the sofa on a Sunday afternoon.
I just can’t see a situation wherein the Bancrofts retain control of the company
and the Journal, as IAPE 1096 would like. This still looks very much like the
beginning of the end of their days as media magnates. And if they’re going to
sell anyway, there are definitely pretty
good reasons to sell to Rupert.