When was the last time you saw a trader using a web browser? I ask because
there seems to
be some worry that if WSJ.com goes free, that might mean fewer people subscribing
to Dow Jones Newswires. I also believe that a reason FT.com hasn’t gone free
is that the FT sells its own content to people using Reuters or Bloomberg screens,
for the same price as a web subscription, and they fear that if the website
is free then no one will pay for the same content on a screen.
I don’t buy it. It’s true that the web is now a much more sophisticated news
delivery mechanism than it used to be, and is in many ways superior to the old
clunky techology driving screen-based systems. But there’s no real way for a
website to "push" content yet (despite that famous
Wired cover story now being over 10 years old), and in any case I just don’t
think that financial professionals really use the web as a news source very
much. That will change, slowly, in the years to come. But for the time being,
I don’t think that Dow Jones Newswires has much to fear from WSJ.com going free.
On the other hand, the people buying content for the screens aren’t always
the same as the people using it. And the buyers might well balk at paying good
money for content which is available free online. Still, I think that worry
is marginal. After all, there’s no shortage of companies
which exist solely to aggregate online information and repackage it in a screen-friendly
format.