Just finished reading Austerlitz,
and everything the reviews
say is true. Sebald
really did manage to come up with a whole new genre of book, neither
memoir nor novel nor concatenation of postmodern digressions. Austerlitz
is a great and haunting work, but I shall leave the superlatives and
the exegesis to the professionals. I would just like to point out
a parallel which seems obvious to me but which I haven’t seen drawn
elsewhere: to the post-war German artist Anselm Kiefer. Both Germans
reinvented their artforms in order to deal with WWII and its aftermath,
the guilt-ridden silence into which much of Germany fell. Austerlitz
was written by an expatriate German and centers on an Anglified Jew
who never sets foot in Germany or learns about the Holocaust until
well into middle age. It is hard not to see Austerlitz’s inability
to face up to his past something which accounts for his neurasthenia
and eventual nervous breakdown as an allegory for Germany as
a whole.
Austerlitz had another effect on me, too: I intend to go out
later today and purchase a small pocket camera which I can load with
black and white film and carry around with me at all times, in much
the same way as Sebald did. My little Canon APS camera is better for
snapshots, and my 35mm compact is too slow, what with all its autofocus
nonsense and tendency to turn itself on by mistake, dirtying the lens.
I’m thinking of getting an old-fashioned rangefinder. There’s a Japanese
one I’ve got my eye on: I think I’ll check it out before my Spanish
class this afternoon.
Austerlitz seems very interesting. I will give some other time to open the link of that book. It really got my interest.
Mary from Épilation intégrale