Meta
Categories
- accounting
- Announcements
- architecture
- art
- auctions
- bailouts
- banking
- bankruptcy
- ben stein watch
- blogonomics
- bonds and loans
- charts
- china
- cities
- climate change
- commercial property
- commodities
- consumers
- consumption
- corporatespeak
- credit ratings
- crime
- Culture
- Davos 2008
- Davos 2009
- defenestrations
- demographics
- derivatives
- design
- development
- drugs
- Econoblog
- economics
- education
- emerging markets
- employment
- energy
- entitlements
- eschatology
- euro
- facial hair
- fashion
- Film
- Finance
- fiscal and monetary policy
- food
- foreign exchange
- fraud
- gambling
- geopolitics
- governance
- healthcare
- hedge funds
- holidays
- housing
- humor
- Humour
- iceland
- IMF
- immigration
- infrastructure
- insurance
- intellectual property
- investing
- journalism
- labor
- language
- law
- leadership
- leaks
- M&A
- Media
- milken 2008
- Not economics
- pay
- personal finance
- philanthropy
- pirates
- Politics
- Portfolio
- prediction markets
- private banking
- private equity
- privatization
- productivity
- publishing
- race
- rants
- regulation
- remainders
- research
- Restaurants
- Rhian in Antarctica
- risk
- satire
- science
- shareholder activism
- sovereign debt
- sports
- statistics
- stocks
- taxes
- technocrats
- technology
- trade
- travel
- Uncategorized
- water
- wealth
- world bank
Archives
- March 2023
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- December 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- March 2012
- April 2011
- August 2010
- June 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- January 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001
- June 2001
- May 2001
- April 2001
- March 2001
- February 2001
- January 2001
- December 2000
- September 2000
- July 2000
- March 2000
- July 1999
Category Archives: insurance
Can Municipalities Wrap Themselves?
The Prince of Wall Street has an intriguing idea: why can’t municipalities set up their own monoline? Why do we not see the big issuers of municipal bonds i.e. the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the State … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Can Municipalities Wrap Themselves?
One Question for John Carney
I don’t want to drag this debate over municipal bonds on too long: I’ve pretty much said my piece. But I would like to ask John Carney just one question. Today, he says this: Investors in municipal bonds are interested … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on One Question for John Carney
Municipal Bonds: Eisinger’s Response to Carney
Jesse Eisinger is of course eternally grateful for my defense of his article against the imprecations of John Carney. But he has more to add: I’m grateful that John took some time out from reporting on the toilet situation at … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Municipal Bonds: Eisinger’s Response to Carney
Letter Writer of the Day: Jay Brown
I think I’m falling a little for Jay Brown, now on his second tour of duty as MBIA CEO. From his letter to shareholders: As the leading monoline, we are also a convenient and attractive target for self-interested parties such … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Letter Writer of the Day: Jay Brown
Monolines: S&P to the Rescue
Now that S&P has affirmed the triple-A ratings on both MBIA and Ambac, Bill Ackman et al are going to have to start playing the long game. With their triple-As seemingly firmly in hand for the time being, any implosion … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Monolines: S&P to the Rescue
Monolines: Ackman’s Latest Plan
Has anybody not seen Bill Ackman’s latest plan for what should happen to the monolines? It’s been doing the email rounds for a couple of days now, but finally it’s hit the web: if you want to download the full … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Monolines: Ackman’s Latest Plan
The End of the Monolines
It looks like the end of the monolines to me. FGIC has already said it’s splitting – something which, legally, is fraught at best. Ambac is trying to raise $2 billion in new equity before, yes, splitting. And now MBIA … Continue reading
Posted in defenestrations, insurance
Comments Off on The End of the Monolines
Monolines: The Spitzer Debate
Eliot Spitzer, having fought and won his battle with investment banks when he was New York’s attorney general, has now set his sights on the monolines. There are two diametrically opposed ways of looking at what’s going on, which is … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
6 Comments
MBIA Fires Back at Ackman
As Congress holds hearings on bond insurers, it’s worth reading MBIA’s official response to Bill Ackman. There’s nothing in there about “the unscrupulous and dangerous market manipulation of short-sellers,” as Herb Greenberg feared. Rather, it’s a pretty sober analysis, which … Continue reading
The Muni Insurance Racket
In the March issue of Portfolio, Jesse Eisinger says that the municipal bond-insurance business is a racket. Back in December I noted that US municipalities pay $2 billion a year to the monolines for the dubious privilege of receiving a … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on The Muni Insurance Racket
Buffett’s Offer Won’t Save the Monolines
Warren Buffett: A mensch with a triple-A rating. Just as the monoline bond insurers are melting down, he offers to ride to the rescue – for an undisclosed fee, of course – and reinsure their liabilities, solving their problems at … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Buffett’s Offer Won’t Save the Monolines
The Future of the Monolines
Andrew Clavell has a really good blog entry on the monolines today, even as MBIA somehow managed to sell $700 million in new equity in the public markets, over and above the $300 million it sold to Warburg Pincus. (Which … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on The Future of the Monolines
Monoline Tsunami Aimed at European Banks
If you skim over headlines in your RSS reader, it’s easy to miss this one: "Ackermann warns of monoline ‘tsunami’". Ackman is bearish on monolines? Wake me up when you have something new to – oh. It’s not Bill Ackman … Continue reading
Monolines: Resigned to Downgrades
The WSJ puts an uncommonly-forthright forward-looking headline on its monoline story today: "Rescue Plans Won’t Prevent Downgrades". And it’s right. If the monolines’ plans for shoring up their capital bases come to fruition, they’re still likely to suffer the loss … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Monolines: Resigned to Downgrades
The Unusual Suspects
It’s like something out of a movie: a bunch of misfits with nothing much in common are thrown together in an attempt to pull off a massive heist – or acquisition of a monoline insurance company, at least. According to … Continue reading
MBIA: Triumph of the Techocrats?
In the battle of Bill Ackman vs MBIA, the market seems to be speaking quite clearly: MBIA is winning, if only by sheer force of boredom. Ackman’s manifesto might be forcefully written, but MBIA’s stock has soared from an opening … Continue reading
Mortgage Insurers: The Next Shoe to Drop?
At the end of 2007, mortgage insurer MGIC had $212 billion of insurance in force. And it’s not performing well: in the fourth quarter alone its claims reached $1.3 billion. The value of the entire company, according to the stock … Continue reading
How Regulators Failed the Monolines
I have a feeling it’s going to be Monoline Day today. MBIA’s conference call at 11am should be interesting, even though the company has said it’s not going to take any live questions from analysts. Until then, the quote of … Continue reading
Posted in insurance, regulation
Comments Off on How Regulators Failed the Monolines
MBIA: Waiting for the Inevitable Downgrade
How is it possible that MBIA lost $2.3 billion in the fourth quarter in the wake of a monster $3.5 billion charge? Didn’t Jonathan Laing just tell us, in Barron’s, that its losses could never get so big so fast? … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on MBIA: Waiting for the Inevitable Downgrade
MBIA: The Longs Fight Back
Have you read anything positive about MBIA recently? The short-sellers – principally Bill Ackman, of course, but also Whitney Tilson – have been dominating the conversation, and since they’ve also been making a huge amount of money one can understand … Continue reading
MBIA and Ambac Fight for Their Lives
Colin Barr: On Friday, analysts at Citi and Bank of America downgraded MBIA and Ambac shares – to hold from buy. Skeptics might note that the move comes with Ambac stock down 94 percent over the past year and MBIA … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on MBIA and Ambac Fight for Their Lives
Warren Buffett, Bond Insurer
I’m fascinated by the news that Warren Buffett is starting up a new bond insurer. On the one hand, it makes perfect sense: he’s an expert in insurance, he already has a triple-A credit rating, and his competitors in the … Continue reading
Posted in bonds and loans, insurance
Comments Off on Warren Buffett, Bond Insurer
How Coventry First Threatens Life Insurance’s Tax Exemption
Today’s WSJ has a very good article on the fast-growing secondary market in life insurance policies, centering on the asset class’s undisputed leader, Coventry. It mentions that this market is objected to by the life insurance industry: Life settlements also … Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on How Coventry First Threatens Life Insurance’s Tax Exemption
Mark-to-Market vs Mark-to-Model in the Insurance Industry
When insurance companies have been in their business for decades or longer, while the open market in such things is very young, does it really make sense for insurance companies to use market valuations rather than their in-house models?
Continue reading
Posted in insurance
Comments Off on Mark-to-Market vs Mark-to-Model in the Insurance Industry